X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=WObJJe8kH2VOnWUS9SgDgdvfPEfTfdf6PqGfmBwEDVA=;
	b=g7y04ht5eJyv9K/KEwNITYpkSpkEbrYjc7hrX5gs2oaKZncMt0qoFduMFRXsXoSwth
	eK7FvUU9ZmBq4F+Sd0/OxzzlnZToWwRI8xOW9U9bd119tg+v9zb09sOFi7y+yjt31LEu
	VwflacBI6Lb/4TmpZCqRXxYzNa5e7DOdOxUShO85Wl2jHUHH1/GZdZEhPai+QffCIEYK
	XR8bXjsCb38hwzcJGjzIvyQN9F9kcTPfDHRFdiaMgqwz8N3WAwIH866SdetN8KB75kBS
	126Sr1Np39fUXZh6DSHBBkmzOaN8oS+DtTMbt1zTsUbOYmYv5xXO1sMRPOcHSuucgQpJ
	c1jQ==
X-Received:	by 10.180.90.37 with SMTP id bt5mr6446135wib.7.1445021133401;
	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:45:28 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Is someone working on a PCB autoplacer?
Message-Id:	<20151016204528.da1f5321d54296c25fb17710@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<1445006837.2017.17.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<1445006837 DOT 2017 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:47:17 +0200
Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:

> Maybe I missed that, but there was so much traffic on this list in the
> last months that I was able to read only a very small fraction.
> 
> An autoplacer has the advantage, that it may be useful also for people
> who wants to do manual routing. And for autorouting it is an important
> component. Another point is, that even a bad autoplacer is useful for
> initial part distribution, so all the arguments people have against
> autorouter are not valid for autoplacers. And development may still be
> some fun. For an autoplacer some support by schematics tool would be
> really useful, for example grouping of elements: An OpAmp with its two
> resistors and two bypass capacitors should build a group, indicating
> that these components belongs together. This is important for the bypass
> capacitors, because their pins both belong to very large nets, gnd and
> power, so location is not determined by net. For signal paths, nets
> should include generally only two or very few pins/pads, so that placer
> can use that information to place components at the correct initial
> position. Another point is, that it would be useful when footprint files
> would contain a bounding box for occupied area -- pads, pins and silk
> may be used for that, but exact box may be better, maybe not only a
> rectangular box, but a polygon or circle.
> 

Even though an exact box is better sometimes I guess the default is good enough for most cases.

- Raw text -