delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
DJ Delorie wrote: > >> He presented his project as "a _proper_ fork" (underline in the >> original). > > So... you're arguing over how proper a proper fork is? No. >> > It's no different than every git branch we create being a "fork" >> > that may or may not get merged, other than irrelevent mechanics >> > and probabilities. >> >> Igor consistently declares to have no intentions to merge his >> changes back to main line geda. Creators of feature branches >> typically are motivated by the prospect to have their feature >> merged. To me this represents the difference between a fork and a >> temporary side step. > > That would be "irrelevent mechanics and probabilities". > > You're arguing over what words mean All of the above is about intentions (rather than words) > Please don't. I will not go into meta mode
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |