X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?)
Date:	Sat, 10 Oct 2015 05:08:01 +0200
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<mv9veh$l8j$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl> <1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAC4O8c_g7e562Gaotrbi6gLfjP6cJU1ys=MtEkDE7bSh4F9dfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com> <CAC4O8c9Bi5HJfcW6wUgm_+4O2gs4vDdBMbS2hF_0dCqnBuJahQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAC4O8c-bnGky=Nab59-pOTJkB8Q9Tc5t5hqE+dnEF-777hUjMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <muv4ua$hat$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060356440 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv> <56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060433080 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv> <56133CC4 DOT 7000306 AT neurotica DOT com> <56137585 DOT 2030004 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhRZoQSJ-kUQfBTngGktreLbrM6=gbr=-+cUO4hx=2RavA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201510061806 DOT t96I6tUG026305 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <56142095 DOT 8030800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510070535130 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv> <mv2u4p$7a2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1510071314110.7137!@igor2priv> <mv4k4c$tip$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <201510080301 DOT t9831weq018628 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-176-22.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:

> Arguing over how forky a fork is is, well, petty.  Igor2 is doing
> something different with the code, fine.  He's also still involved
> with us, fine.  Why is this a problem?

He presented his project as "a _proper_ fork" (underline in the 
original).


> It's no different than every
> git branch we create being a "fork" that may or may not get merged,
> other than irrelevent mechanics and probabilities.

Igor consistently declares to have no intentions to merge his changes 
back to main line geda. Creators of feature branches typically are 
motivated by the prospect to have their feature merged. To me this 
represents the difference between a fork and a temporary side step.

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -