X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=NEQG7Ldq2+EMuDFsQzX5ICL3/PCF8zQH7DYOqjfvlAg=;
	b=JRg3ka5DVrxa1u3wMkxjsDsk2PKfwhncfMOD2izhSmNlyKgfG7Bx4Af9c/wgpt2/s+
	PxZ0dUsh1Xhe2w7Cp/S38qJzHRgXYndJXLE1NQ/ggLa2UP+ZUvh877Pq02X5u1CgwrtI
	HWRcGhWrzb//Yd7tx+YVSUzkVH4dctgXJTa0ciRG1EhTV06oMfQtwKQzhr318NQJcrdO
	4lRIIphAvDsyQCU2XpGuwPZW5AgMt3uJoLA9nIXKEYEsMvYHRXZHlNGQljmFHjxHw9rA
	LVxyIEgh0NFCn05wok4/KCjrIdg8XfzWTVVcvVW0MxZJXWi8LzJ3Neptwt+GuzJAG4vl
	C67A==
X-Received:	by 10.194.60.115 with SMTP id g19mr15430954wjr.29.1444410214666;
	Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:03:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:03:29 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] list not user friendly?
Message-Id:	<20151009190329.c33c2ba271e0abdf5ac7d971@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<2BF04629-93A7-4299-9FE7-F01584269B84@noqsi.com>
References:	<20151008122325 DOT 1913297qo8i1esw0 AT webmail DOT oregonstate DOT edu>
	<596B15AA-2E03-4914-A880-810DFA46D255 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQKJvZxyKMD3UvWrTOJGE2J+ntLt-8uMcZTA+Qkd80Cig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<762773A2-9D0F-437A-AB2A-3B77A3E8099F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<5617E47D DOT 7080608 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<20151009162012 DOT 18319 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<2BF04629-93A7-4299-9FE7-F01584269B84 AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>  An app developer working for one of my clients thought he was a real
> >> hotshot.  One day in a conversation he gave me a cocky grin and
> >> proudly said he won't touch a library if it hasn't seen code commits
> >> in the past month or so.
> >> 
> >>  He doesn't work there anymore.
> > 
> > I completely understand where his argument is coming from, activity
> > in the project feeling more important than anything else, but I agree
> > that it's not the only thing that is important, and I also agree that
> > it's more important what the "absolute state" of the project is like.
> 
> I think activity at gedasymbols.org is a far more accurate indicator of project health than developer activity.

It is a sign of people using gEDA.

- Raw text -