delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Evan Foss wrote: > To me having 2 releases (one stable & one unstable) a year is ideal. What is the point of an unstable release? Sounds like a contradiction to me. > Too many makes me worry that bugs will creep in Why would bugs creep faster if releases come in shorter intervals? > and break my actually work in some way. For the record: I habitually use monthly compiled binaries from git/head pretty much since geda switched to git (2008?). There have been incidents when the build failed for some reason. But I never had them break my actual work. > I think externally it looks better to > have a steady predictable release cycle than a fast one. There are probably more serious issues to the looks of gEDA... ---<)kaimartin(>---
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |