X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=HyVPsG79zOkVHrizC18TYPLj5L8OHP7WqPmGhm64vLc=;
	b=nLyrrZTi8596m5FOunFzRlx7qw1+zkuShRz+wD0xLwyVWVMQpdTKamAxWdNBX2zcc4
	pVFFIhVU7KfG5/oD/RgSD6EWQiI32yZ3Qw7VF28jq8G3uQDksugg07dFE3oND+INghlF
	1xQfVoTiRdR5Bu5uhVMkDn2Zhp2I52vewRKuU/hbhrMY+kyUwQiYTgScla+diT8d6J37
	G5a3nOkcADT14j5J5WSQe7iedizGH/NKuC7xCUyirjXYMmU5y4ci2xXJQXbPhKV+MfHs
	TJhvNUfwh/6ZlCVlzkbwZWMLsn6xoSh+RL5Jg5Oh7t2JM6TDm8lAHL+tH4bbQvpbsrlh
	t/ag==
X-Received:	by 10.25.23.170 with SMTP id 42mr1026348lfx.42.1444245383603;
	Wed, 07 Oct 2015 12:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 7 Oct 2015 22:16:21 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer
Message-ID:	<20151007191621.GB29646@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040454040 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1510040454040.7137@igor2priv>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 04:58:10AM +0200, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
...
> >And that's the "success story" of our community.
> >Every smart enough hacker tries to rewrite everything in his favourite
> >language.
> >
> 
> You say that like if you didn't insist on using scheme. I mean you don't
> have to rewrite gschem because it already uses your favorite language, but
> would you join Stefan and write ruby instead?
At the time I started to work on geda (after reading many ads on it), I
didn't know anything about Scheme/Lisp. Now I like it. If the Stefan's
project would be the stock one at that time, I would most likely join
him and study ruby. I don't see any point of rewriting all alone besides
'just for fun' (c), especially when the project is large and mature
enough.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -