Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/10/07/07:28:48
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>>> If you prefer bugs fixed not only using a different bug tracker, but in
>>> an entire code fork, please join Igor2, Peter Clifton, Stefan Salewski,
>>> ... oh, wait, all these people don't want to join anybody. Too bad.
>>
>> That is a lie.
>
> Can we agree to calm the tone down a little bit, please?
I would like to. But a lie is a lie, I can't help it. You would respond
too, if I said things like "Kai-Martin wants the windows port of gschem
die". If I did such false statements repeatedly, wouldn't you start
calling them lies?
>
>> I love to work in team and I'm open to join teams. When I have a project
>> set up I am open to anyone joining it. I did not attempt join the
>> official geda team because I felt like they were doing things in the
>> wrong way.
>
> Well, seen from a distance, this is just what Markus wrote. You did not
> feel like joining the "official geda team". You sure have your reasons.
> And you surely are not alone. There is no need to feel insulted.
Nope, he literally wrote: "don't want to join anybody"
Please read again; it's not "don't want to join the geda team".
>
>
>> I still think both the management and a lot of coding aspects
>> are going in the wrong way. It's my personal opinion. I don't want to
>> change their ways,
>
> There is an alternative consequence: Namely the desire to actually change
> the way the project is run. IMHO, both positions have their merits. Let's
> not call out each other on this.
I did not. He had a claim what my opinion/intentionsare which I confuted
with describing my actual opinion/intentions. He answered by repeating his
claim.
>
>
>> but I don't want the better way not to happen, so I
>> made a _proper_ fork.
>
> While you technically forked the code. You still did not go all the way.
> That would have included complete separation of website, communication
I do have a completly separate website. I did publish the URL.
> channels and mailing list, wiki, library-site, and whatnot. Instead, you
Until there are enough users, there's no need to set up a mailing list.
I don't have a wiki, not because I'm using geda's wiki but because I don't
feel the need to have a wiki for the project at all.
I do have a separate library. It does have a website too. I did publish
the URL.
> still mess with the rest of us here in regular geda-user.
I do not mess with anyone. Since pcb-rnd is compatible with pcb, I
regard it as a relative of the geda effort and I think the geda-user list
is appropriate place to discuss it. Precendents show this sort of things
are happening all the time on the list, there are a lot of tools that are
not officially part of the geda suite but they are so closely related that
people just use this list to discuss them.
>
> This sends ambiguous messages. But it is totally ok, too. Just accept that
Ambiguous message like what? I tried to make my intentions clear, if you
still have doubts, feel free to ask.
> not everybody may cheer for your way. And after all, there are vastly more
> than one way to do things. No need to get emotional about.
I do accept that. I don't accept when someone is misrepresenting my
opinion/words. I do not get emotional about it, but I do respond and tell
my actual opinion.
>
>
>> About my project not open to other people joining:
>
> Hmm. I did not see anyone say anything about this direction.
Again, he said "all these people don't want to join anybody". I take
joining is bidiretional: I join an existing group or if I am already in a
group, others may join. If I didn't want to join anybody, I would have
closed down my group so noone could join it (== I didn't need to join
them in the same group). I just wanted to make it clear that I am open in
both directions and to make sure there's no room for misinterpreting my
intention about joining in any direction.
Regards,
Igor2
- Raw text -