X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] How to fix gerbv to compile with gcc5?
References:	<20151006115833 DOT GA6570 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
From:	Robert Drehmel <robert AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com>
X-Mailer:	iPhone Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To:	<20151006115833.GA6570@visitor2.iram.es>
Message-Id:	<EF02E185-BEA6-41D8-A187-93EBE001C901@zoot.drehmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 14:59:51 +0200
To:	"geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0 (1.0)
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K0:ZJVB7VRoCcUAQAyTljX9PiCGJjXAF44D33h+/Z2sSGvfrzA/wjL
	yl/4rvZHLTBcaiJtMMpj3VzGcVWUnMhh+Of15jZfys5pJj4rM4Pmix8tvWqDGHYaTekW1iv
	6uHO9ZjK/EdLSeLkZNsVsTQDty4GfQolhLKAHFycm9kvc3Htt3UXBZZCr6nPgVuBNW7Td2n
	uA0LVZXNVh5TVdewbjaFA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:2YaOgEYKkM0=:wIP0iDcvklPCxcH9hgW96U
	qr7FYeIr1JH8Xa6N67ekqhOZoYBQycAA05u/QyVpBCvB1orLsT/1oezHMzKmXuwYQjIV89NK5
	Y/5eIi1yuKtT6ojO1GxXT4IghZcUARc7hsCvrs4IXkJ3gJ8V7VOpT7oEKEjRA1YWUl46VRsT0
	EskFaFvZVu+Ec++24Nu7OTAhuIlI0Ur2/EjGCfwL4kOYx0s/fYW9AbHhv9bY5HPAH8Zuzv5Oe
	GL8DUIpqZIxnjLCw6T6Zz/3vU0TysPDy/bdr1AVHfGGZvBRIFEC8zI3TNbyqP0UPApfapoDXY
	LIIkA20+RLRYYx5sD2TdqWBueFeWBgxi70hLpOB88HSBTHbND1YBceXR1kzSXvFzByi0nPf4k
	4XVAS5FW9TagYKULTSuJN8kmAT5ZoMIa2Hbjfx0MPDWOavjLdIhrhOmDL2pdyPk6OgXnVVsQU
	R1TXXwiZ2/4OJpxROwdPgT9aZEyuBKjuh3tT++6NFltzazuyVy2Tip6hYhTYENuIV3IIcCTXF
	UTUUyUMl0au06oWgulToZzjFsEC5Xb7AoInQAZm2lovKWvt2+KETbYZRWbhPCtwmvs0vYeeUL
	szDe3q3+W5nqXH3WkFuk6krzoblt2qsqXGX28WsWqPQChKT0WfTmPUXK7rPEnKx5z8n52gYLA
	TN/KrH5KxaBROeAdjuWzUUoXkzv5Z15C+bZUd83DfBx4pwn8c6KgqrarZRB39xzSCC7XmrIDv
	vQvWISohrlyhxsnu
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t96D06lC025279
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Oct 6, 2015, at 13:58, "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Another possibility is to move the inlined function definitions to the
> selection.h header file. That's what I did, but I'm not sure it's worth
> the small gain in efficiency.

Hi Gabriel,
I think this is actually the correct approach, given that these functions seem to be only small convenience wrappers.

- Raw text -