X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1444109846;
	bh=LWAr/nW3wORwREB8cx6xwHMn01M8oFTHb5K4OLiv4uE=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=D0XQ39RrRjgeYKq71M1zLT4kBO7V+wQCmtfUt2xGPXHEz3F2aEvNXnAHN8L019Ft0
	sH8ohL+ngEhqI8FfTF0xJaQl8hj4hPgTA4ayR9QET0GrlzT2D1Sz6FTkcxekaZKFjz
	RPb6Xpav/c0VG/rRT8eLNqGWe5pg/rcaVgz9/1A8=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer (router, auto?)
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c_g7e562Gaotrbi6gLfjP6cJU1ys=MtEkDE7bSh4F9dfg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443975731 DOT 671 DOT 52 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151004191717 DOT bf8223417541a9306bfbd9ea AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9Bi5HJfcW6wUgm_+4O2gs4vDdBMbS2hF_0dCqnBuJahQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1443997480 DOT 2068 DOT 32 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<CAC4O8c-bnGky=Nab59-pOTJkB8Q9Tc5t5hqE+dnEF-777hUjMg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1444070851 DOT 1014 DOT 20 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <muv4ua$hat$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060356440 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<56133047 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTw5QMLxLUOcALG1dubTaVkzA+VGxz2x376JB-Mg186RA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<56133B15 DOT 6020402 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRHwpe1MTdgR6q-SLrxK=qRwoj+zb4eS6Ku+x4FKspLDw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<56134243 DOT 3060203 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510060601390 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<56135E15.6000007@neurotica.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 01:37:25 -0400
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1510060601390.7137@igor2priv>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t965bWxf021897
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 10/06/2015 12:07 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> list in the past several weeks are accomplishing little other than
>> proving that there can be no consensus here.
>>
>>  Personally I treat this a bit like the existence of "goto" in C: It is
>> never, ever intended to actually be used in code.  It is a "sign post".
> 
> Do you have any reference on this? I mean a quote from the guys who
> actually developed C and added goto in the first place? Or is is just
> your guess?

  A "reference"?  No, but your attempt to dismiss it as a "guess" will
fail.  I hate name-dropping, so I won't drop any names.

  It was presented to me as an opinion by a mentor and former employer
of mine a long time ago, as he was teaching me the basics of C.  Perhaps
we can call that an "educated guess".  ~30 years of C programming later,
I've taken that opinion as my own.  Perhaps we can call that an
"experienced guess".  So, during this conversation:

  http://www.neurotica.com/misc/DSC_0193.JPG

  ...I asked "one of the guys who actually developed C" about it and he
concurred, with a hearty laugh.

  Close enough?

                -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -