X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=wQduBIeLaXUg2V4m8scKUALkqF3oNUW0A05NenlBRfo=;
	b=GeL9rBG/iQm4COvPJs2yezQ878dYvH0/325KB3mgjiGnHGMJCLhyMuqFEQrmJud/Fd
	PqUZp5NmV3i7thIjkDHPcaB367DiWe8bt4NVvFg4SzicHccfrrG1e6LiPjExOJ0FmD+m
	ozc+519Q0HYV/FvXbD/7ccwEMHpBtV/JuA3wqBYc9gkxyrbTmePGvIxqr4D6IFGgIhX4
	Q2yMMCiS+yf014ZnYYCNIahLeLsrbixht2KcfPvLwt2PiCOhwL4xs3BjPFSwTKEAfjFl
	6K6UJSltGrpc7tePoUuDyGXY8IuGBWR1cGljcj8G2s+ha39sC3nmok9sXzTEAAgEyJNj
	1Y8Q==
X-Received:	by 10.195.11.165 with SMTP id ej5mr22602994wjd.117.1444068911933;
	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:15:06 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Clutterless user interface or even more custom
	special super features?
Message-Id:	<20151005201506.e85ead5b3b2e0e83821b1fa9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201510051722.t95HMGaj025044@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<56100AF8 DOT 4090802 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<muq108$s12$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20151005072529 DOT GA26068 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
	<CAJZxidAqEJv+0eSMbnOH39y-ThoXDZitv1w56Gmj0Q4y0paNAA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151005153014 DOT 1af231ef2d4eee97a0dd0054 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201510051505 DOT t95F5uRI019817 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20151005180922 DOT f9720de6c048092686e81761 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201510051722 DOT t95HMGaj025044 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > It is also possible to add a list with objects listed by selectors
> > like for example: layer, Refdes, footprint value, object type, ...
> 
> I can see that being useful, but I also see it being complex and
> difficult to implement in an intuitive way.  For example, if you only
> check certain layers, but also check "lines", do those choices
> intersect, or union?  What about merging "vias" with a refdes filter?
> (yes, vias can be named, just like elements).  If you only enable
> lines, should we disable the via tool?  And if one of the selection
> filter options is "locked items" how does that change how we merge
> options?
> 
> Internally, we'd need some standard rules as well, for cases where the
> tool being used needs to filter out things it can't operate on, and
> how to combine those rules with user-selected rules.

Another option is to use a tree view like in PADS instead of a search filter. I think result would be the same for example to show all footprints of the same type on a particular layer it is possible with a tree view or two selectors layer=value,footprint=value.

I should look at zorn some day maybe I could give it a try in gEDA.

- Raw text -