X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=urqhw7lbY/LNs/43Y8j6CNY5JWqHDUkSc67DOe46UOY=;
	b=ot3wW4femo50o7tq/2hjojdBZ6osuzzLgQGPhm9jYHPDmHvFDmox79zmNkK+j5qQtT
	i/OH8o8bD8LfB6433/wjC+MpAqMkjIs456LtAhic6R2efG2JkBpyLrELxPmjIuMadreV
	9DZemdP5h/eUxyT6tvVi/hxzibESj6fQOeXy803bbGL6pb2wJBw/Zv+hMxg4ldXU+ulC
	Vv4If891vpDP6xlnzSpFAXo0b5F7Vw7BEjoXp345A3+xkQDmbW1clYMDKcrtngtrvtFl
	bVZ/RKpUmUujTSoHR8Bnp95sBGUHMyE3Da3Q0C/FZxdnoAMG4o4K7n/KP/+Chd9VzeJJ
	7ZEw==
X-Received:	by 10.180.24.102 with SMTP id t6mr8341446wif.83.1443995402538;
	Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 23:50:01 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer
Message-Id:	<20151004235001.4945fcedc89af0ea4295e357@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<1443981054.671.65.camel@ssalewski.de>
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040454040 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<1443972926 DOT 671 DOT 14 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510041835450 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<20151004192716 DOT aed111eda679b33c18c8329f AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443981054 DOT 671 DOT 65 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> >  but I usually write in C. Usually language is not very important
> > although readily available suitable software libraries may however be
> > rather important.
> 
> There are many, often contradicting points to consider. Community,
> available books and examples, quality of compilers or interpreters,
> libraries and bindings, existing projects, speed, stability, security,
> job market...
> And of course the quality of the language itself, and fun using it.

Yes but for already written code I usually stick to the language already used.

Most languages use the concept of functions, procedures or similar their parameters could be passed and at least one values is returned their however exceptions like sed the stream editor I think anyway. Usually it is also possible to link or copy data. If the language is not object oriented it is usually possible to use structures instead of objects although it is not as a good as an object oriented language.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -