X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=tmVvdB15v9SYXMcb0lIYq7mUEc+xo1LwZXNfc7mU9bU=;
	b=Jrgppp62r8HfYmAiOJzl/63aCpoHZ3FPppg9RU9RhMt/mkCaju+t7NKqj+M8D+o51E
	oRicnSmGrr7JK2Gox5BStWfPLa0uvwY/AvCCD6hBfmSCLXL4Nix/zxSE1KsUggWPTk4u
	4M6ZaAeZVVDReOYTwH4KY9ifTXrh1WXdqH9LRk3bxOWQvDF8ZgQIN9yqTyhBEDHoWnQ8
	FIKoQeOjHVgBJQSC1BjASRQ75BCKvmIFMk+bnbpv5PIUWsxwdt9RcpMFHn9QOYcm0hez
	39rUrIvVfO8yN8kbtSkn5Y9bvd0zdIfa9VCWSnFX5jkVf1vCSlcV4Rm3zUKbqRS4pQLP
	d2ng==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.180.39.193 with SMTP id r1mr7515801wik.57.1443994953719;
	Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20151004105653.GA2691@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAC4O8c8QJEObqLzLG2cwju6qXcKWR-LJdUox6AvUa047tmU+2g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20151004105653 DOT GA2691 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 13:42:33 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-oLgAwXoWCCL8y85rwMxHq1JUWoc573aCEV48U42SqHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a11c2b93046298005214e46e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 03:10:37PM -0800, Britton Kerin (
> britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> ...
> > I heart a lot of people hate gtk3, I don't know if its fair or not but
> I'm
> > definitely comfortable with the way gtk2 works and it would be annoying
> to
> > have to learn new behaviors if it forces that.
> 1. Opinions vary.
> 2. We don't know if it would be better or worse than what we have now.
> 2. How can we see what will change if we do nothing? Please don't
> discourage developers from doing what they want (that is the real work).
> They also have their own tastes and want to make things better.
>
> >
> > Also I think almost certainly there are things that would give greater
> > return on time spent than this.
>
> Could you please list the most important ones here?
>

Sure.  I'd like toporouter and a design library visible on the web much
better than Gtk3 support.  However, I agree that if gtk3 support is the
only thing a given contributor wants to work on, they should do so.

--001a11c2b93046298005214e46e5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (<a href=3D"mailto:vzh=
banov AT gmail DOT com">vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT d=
elorie.com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mai=
lto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt;<=
/span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8=
ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 03:=
10:37PM -0800, Britton Kerin (<a href=3D"mailto:britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com">br=
itton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">ge=
da-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] wrote:<br>
...<br>
&gt; I heart a lot of people hate gtk3, I don&#39;t know if its fair or not=
 but I&#39;m<br>
&gt; definitely comfortable with the way gtk2 works and it would be annoyin=
g to<br>
&gt; have to learn new behaviors if it forces that.<br>
1. Opinions vary.<br>
2. We don&#39;t know if it would be better or worse than what we have now.<=
br>
2. How can we see what will change if we do nothing? Please don&#39;t<br>
discourage developers from doing what they want (that is the real work).<br=
>
They also have their own tastes and want to make things better.<br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Also I think almost certainly there are things that would give greater=
<br>
&gt; return on time spent than this.<br>
<br>
Could you please list the most important ones here?<br></blockquote><div><b=
r></div><div style=3D"">Sure.=C2=A0 I&#39;d like toporouter and a design li=
brary visible on the web much better than Gtk3 support.=C2=A0 However, I ag=
ree that if gtk3 support is the only thing a given contributor wants to wor=
k on, they should do so.=C2=A0</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

--001a11c2b93046298005214e46e5--

- Raw text -