X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	OkrYdmXDeCMssByA2gerQBv+f22yQf7yEAZ07jrhFds=; b=vpJrqw2AMYVITPTZ
	gSRPk7+vjKGog6CJn9B9LMKIO0GhDS8rVAdumANy3xMbmHCYcud4JVylpDpOR1lb
	H/lRu30yV0UUORPXpP/vwihevAKaIKX2hMWYN51bcHt33gqV6XubgBSzvUwcdUzJ
	DLjo0MM+v9bTYO3cfp6ngRpznPM=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040454040 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<1443972926 DOT 671 DOT 14 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510041835450 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<20151004192716 DOT aed111eda679b33c18c8329f AT gmail DOT com>
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<56116F4F.3050208@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 20:26:23 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20151004192716.aed111eda679b33c18c8329f@gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 04.10.2015 um 19:27 schrieb Nicklas Karlsson:
>> My point is that it is totally okay that people prefer their own lagnuages 

> I think ADA is probably the best available language but I usually write in C. Usually language is not very important...

While such statements are mostly true for new code, wild language mixes
are a nightmare for maintenance. If you plan to live forever and also
can make sure you maintain your own code for the next 30 years, feel
free to use any language you desire.

If you're a more typical human you'll abandon your code not long after
it works. If you feel like fixing upcoming bugs at all.

And from there on things go south. Because maintainers are a rare
species anyways and ones willing to learn a new language for every other
file of code even more.

When reviewing code I not only care about the language, I also care
about conventions like variable naming, commenting strategy, indentation
and other seemingly pointless stuff.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -