X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=yAGFsB92NvjObDfqv6sj+H0eejrjXwPYbKvGKCeLtjU=;
	b=kcVvvRFZox227+UKMsjaatCKONtNDC03c8hJluvYZjWYEaoGWU3Okr7u/fxJD/PfXJ
	aVXq+V+tHHVQcENMKLF6cRoZH20+RjouFeB6dagErb9m3SLGfeV/SrwsYYwdO4vgSQXx
	sCu1OdS/R807rrRV8u6ddHyQy4wgXGSK2YE/fhZVspxv5elZPmGGYwxFRV1CJj6QrWyx
	XNUBqBgyRCMacGzVwZlPvOEnHuQ+mo0p4i19DK5S6q5q9bgrjKCrD/bynNQRFelQPyUf
	qJzm555l6l3alIhKhLiMUwbxbNgKhoagbKKekDZNXDP1ZgFzESMKwoSMJht0aUWD3Ht5
	OHbw==
X-Received:	by 10.180.187.141 with SMTP id fs13mr8159615wic.13.1443979638049;
	Sun, 04 Oct 2015 10:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 19:27:16 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] GTK3, Glade interface designer
Message-Id:	<20151004192716.aed111eda679b33c18c8329f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1510041835450.7137@igor2priv>
References:	<20151003210701 DOT de392b925f54dadb0a5fedd8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<1443903758 DOT 1873 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<56104A0A DOT 9020507 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<1443909591 DOT 1873 DOT 18 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20151003222248 DOT GB4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510040454040 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
	<1443972926 DOT 671 DOT 14 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510041835450 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> >>> And that's the "success story" of our community.
> >>> Every smart enough hacker tries to rewrite everything in his
> >> favourite
> >>> language.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You say that like if you didn't insist on using scheme. I mean you
> >> don't
> >> have to rewrite gschem because it already uses your favorite
> >> language, but
> >> would you join Stefan and write ruby instead?
> >
> > Sorry, I do not really understand that comment.
> 
> My point is that it is totally okay that people prefer their own lagnuages 
> and sometimes rewrite stuff when they think they have a better idea (or 
> better preferences). I doubt that Vladimir would do otherwise in a
> similar situation - it's just lucky for him that his language preferneces 
> happen to meet gschem's.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Igor2

I think ADA is probably the best available language but I usually write in C. Usually language is not very important although readily available suitable software libraries may however be rather important.

Nicklas Karlsson

- Raw text -