X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	PbirTIojnE68/kpuqz/UCGW+eTsp+ien+QGwZPIN6FQ=; b=CPyWynkcJV1oRkph
	X1tno2cROx5CIc/U85OA5BZOpUa7+MraOzwcverjkXK8ykyQdyksEjbNcfdMUtjT
	wSEkzmvrmpch9esr9u5GRnAvZ0YhM5gWTQ3Vco4shMwSz3kNuY9UdMqqjIL0bztT
	cO+5W3YzejwN7kWeBeCPaTWRGbw=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<5610F941.2050404@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Sun, 4 Oct 2015 12:02:41 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20151003222928.GC4287@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 04.10.2015 um 00:29 schrieb Vladimir Zhbanov:
> The one advantage I see is moving the project forward.

A version bump isn't a "move forward" by its self.

> In order to bump the version we have to throw out obsolete functions and
> replace them with new ones, which as a whole will ease transition to
> gtk3 in future.

Moving to Gtk3 is certainly "moving forward". I'd focus on the goal, the
move to Gtk3, and if this happens to require a version bump, then one
has a good reason to let it happen.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -