X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc.
Date:	Sun, 04 Oct 2015 04:17:38 +0200
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<muq282$f51$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<CAC4O8c_kjtsHhyjH+fPZvhDdPxc+Z+L5RxPy4SpJ8dmcGNKMiA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <munf8m$u7l$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <560F9BE2 DOT 80104 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-107-162.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Markus Hitter wrote:

> Am 03.10.2015 um 04:41 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
>> You mean a use case where the user manually deletes long range rats
>> to get a better feel for the local situation? IMHO, a delete is
>> already a crutch in itself.
> 
> Generated rat lines are only a hint. If one deletes them, they'll
> re-appear on the next "optmize rats", so they're not really
> "deleted".

That's why I went on to wishful think about an ignore flag for rats :)

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -