delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version | |
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; | |
bh=HA5NMrXrlkZ0hE39PJyf9g0qX8vISabD28vHsXD2sOI=; | |
b=TQlpulGcx3IsyMo7N9WS4nz35maVEQbXjh2Fgo02etZfmlyD13mImfwlXzQIyiW3K1 | |
f+f2kB6J3Uo6BEtrimI7DgqsDCqjDpUH89SnKwz7llH7u/CEp503qxiINAiBLVOj/U3A | |
0eXxjdSLxx8qQWXjv65LK5SplmVh1QDaXd8383hR0BzKEwMKEbvKZmiRTlOTFCECY9m5 | |
MDpLCb1jWMbszcAIZQUMkcb/Aih5LNHfffOzQiuVJKxfADgiRNVBeO1DCmWv+PWeD+OQ | |
xJ2Z9jCkMqD+MGM6lTtbLVXFPRLaCtbd+gfU+Z9p/d7u0io1ndIYgD9guQsA0DRN57Z4 | |
2nTw== | |
X-Received: | by 10.194.52.67 with SMTP id r3mr15714482wjo.51.1443301503653; |
Sat, 26 Sep 2015 14:05:03 -0700 (PDT) | |
Date: | Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:04:58 +0200 |
From: | "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gschem, best size of symbols and text? |
Message-Id: | <20150926230458.9559cb838aece9b43daeb240@gmail.com> |
In-Reply-To: | <mu6jln$ddd$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <1442845842 DOT 2167 DOT 27 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> |
<mttolv$d52$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<1442999974 DOT 23194 DOT 15 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> | |
<mu6jln$ddd$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
X-Mailer: | Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> > Default grid > > size to symbol size is more important. A very fine grid gives us > > very many possible positions to put elements and nets, which makes > > it "difficult". For gschem, I would use 200 as major grid generally, > > Hmm. I am ok with the default 100. During schematic capture I never > felt like the grid should be more coarse. > Design of a symbol is a different issue, though. I often find myself > dial down the grid size to be able to move bits and pieces to where > they belong. While I think about it, it would be nice to have an accel > key to directly switch to the default grid. Dynamically change grid size on zoom is good. Just zoom in to get a finer grid.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |