Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/08/31/22:54:41
Hi all,
in spite of my efforts, the previous thread mostly turned into the usual
"dreaming and throwing in random ideas" thing. No surprise, I've seen this
happening a lot with back annotation threads in the past. Thanks for DJ
for his proposal and for those who did read the proposals and cotributed
with useful additions.
I am still determined to implement the feature, and I still think it can
be done in a relatively short time frame once it's started. So I will
mostly ignore the other thread and kick off the sceond phase by this mail.
After considering DJ's idea, I think it wouldn't save me solving the
tricky parts in gschem. It'd provide pin mapping (that I already have
anyway) and a more generic solution to options/swapping/slotting, but
would take more efforts to do and wouldn't provide some of the other
features I originally wanted to have (e.g. footprint changes kin pcb). So
I decided to stay with my original proposal, plus think over some of the
aspects brought up in the othe thread.
What the projdct needs next is a gschem contributor. Please read what kind
of contribution is exactly needed at:
http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/devlog/20150901a_back_ann.html
Please note: if you reply without reading that url, I will ignore your
reply; if you are offering ideas and no contributions about these
specific 3 points, please use the other thread. Yup, I am already prepared
to the case that noone offers contribution, you don't need to remind me
on that possibility.
Regards,
Igor2
- Raw text -