X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=zzrI5kx7BhKMlKAemqM6DtWFynvY4qH8NPltfE3mVLI=;
	b=Ho0R1hdP++MNDSmbyi9u7/FlcNJYqXZ/AvDwDHL21pQm15NOS6IiV3ojc3Yl6zZzjS
	FFjb3X9UaglwS1nkS1S+gWNUn8OsTYnyRzQ+Xh3MN+e7bNHxpETA75I3x0ytYNTMcPUf
	xph9X/Q+bLf/tggc9EjmiyZ6GpFEpGc4hcNKeMA0I18BC3SVIiBP+pufbN+JB6slw0rp
	b2RCnvc640LLz2XO9BPorcf2YYYfqVvCDT7DdiKnz4ZnB37ZpmAdQKkjiIaU8IgLl2i8
	4V68TlK259hixGyPmKkpuEj4IdMSdl85OsMBfoExM7kjXPe4F+BzPM1b1Oh6YEp6dHpm
	TACA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr31860221lah.31.1440602079437;
	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<55DDD4DB.2060008@ecosensory.com>
References:	<CAC4O8c_PFbZFYfBfw0cQwG9CDtrOxqxSEPunMQy7U3ueN7K1_Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAHUm0tPFbbOwggNS-b=30CNgsOLpH14-LDbcv8AWo_BLPmf98g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150826000523 DOT 353 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhQi83=d+H6be6z6v7HkchdXqkfkiypKsQf0mM+QGdiH9A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55DDD4DB DOT 2060008 AT ecosensory DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 11:14:39 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhS8k-S0HMcupk+TxNxmr_ukLX6aDzkqqy_UGVQMgzdmCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] SQL PCB file format
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:01 AM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
> On 08/25/2015 07:50 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>> Guys if we fixed the HID no one should ever need to look at the file
>> content in a text editor.
>
>
> That IS how the users of PADS operate.  The netlist is the thing that is
> text checked, text processed,
> if any.
>
> But how bad is the human readable version of sqlite?
>
> Searching for this, I find some talking encryption think it is OK as is
> even:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/986403/encrypted-file-or-db-in-python
> SQLite databases are pretty human-readable, and there isn't any built-in
> encryption.
>
> but there are almost no hits.  Very few people think sqlite is "readable"
>
> The data files could be densified some from the SQLite file.  Or just
> convert back and forth
> from the existing file structure.

It might not be encrypted but the fields for what data is where are
not human readable so it might as well be.

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -