X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=NZnm+t9d9oIRigbG40uH4iMeZweBp3CtKoBRsEXLBmA=;
	b=T5AR6r6eigR4Ys7fUWKpBMYty15fEnlYOHw4XcR5iLV3tHr56W8dRcHCKcwbAwyWf5
	iGJ94wktOljlnhSIffSDNNnlWljO6U2lbgdA+zO/PR5FDDGO6c4I4LEkRAF1C7VgN7mk
	d6PdZnPnYGN4HrUh1jZECwUrOQADHqT92N0L/kzfLpmy+pAn8d4z17/ag1TWc5Y+TCyu
	6rlFVJCjpJRufh3oF/meXxH6ySkQRmjK4Wn17OHUqZHQ3/lVbQd4b2wSioParKHqC0xY
	SRpKWVZNyje6uQSIQJxGJQMauE/bgKOmv7DCT7S1qhUklyZyG4OIQgjfz27um1LJgoya
	hqiw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr28906955lah.31.1440549818052;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c8N53Yf=AXwNhVYX=NJ_ua5gKVD4zBipTHsrFcaFRbt-w@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSC6UfCr8ixF5iuffmUhcdgVuz9nA+YjiZNk8-f7Q5r-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231935040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c8PyLQNgxz1SP-98ZhyH5KPDmnNpiULVvdL+TMo-DhN4w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508240407100 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAC4O8c_HdSL-3+etrvPozAZuqUX-Rqx4FGACkchttRkZsFhYPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhQMUdE_Z6OnJPTgTbkcQ4fWp6rGnrXib48S71tsGmMMSw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8N53Yf=AXwNhVYX=NJ_ua5gKVD4zBipTHsrFcaFRbt-w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:43:37 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhR688yVQMbWOe-SjULMBzOga=xRtC_9_WFnoS4Z5uWWMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Britton Kerin
(britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Britton Kerin
>> (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
>> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:29 PM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via
>>>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately no one is going to be nearly so well positioned to merge
>>>>> your
>>>>> stuff as you are.  Relatively, it will be painfully inefficient for
>>>>> them and they
>>>>> will feel it as they work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately no one is as unmotivated to invest time in this as I am. This
>>>> won't happen, sorry.
>>>
>>> I take it you acknowledge that no one can do it as easily as you.  But
>>> I guess you
>>> also feel that since others don't want to bother much, there's no
>>> reason you should
>>> bother or use build/vcs you dislike.
>>
>> I know we would all like Igor2 to do what *we* want but isn't it
>> enought that he is gifting us with code that is written around our
>> project? The answer is no and we should respect that he does not want
>> to carry us. Surely someone else can look at his VCS commits, do some
>> diffs and make some patches. The mission for those people (including
>> me) who want PCB to stay around should be to figure out how to do
>> this, not how to control someone else's time.
>
> It's not a matter of controlling his time, but of who can do the work
> efficiently.  Merging other people's code is both time-wise inefficient
> and much more likely to create nasty bugs than if they do it themselves.
> The sad thing is that apparently Igor once wanted to, and has since
> decided that he's determined not to.  Reasons for the change appear
> to include aversion to DVCS and autoconf.

I brought this up while I was testing pcb-rnd. Numerous other people
made the same comments. If we were trying to change a group dynamic it
would be good to have another voice in the crowd but this is one
person. I don't like it when a crowd of people chants at one person.

>>>

snip

>>> My fantasy when I heard about ruby scripting in pcb was that perhaps Stefan's
>>> router might someday see the light of day afterall.  Oh well
>>
>> I keep seeing mentions of this legendary router. I have been these
>> gEDA lists +10 years but I don't remember it. What was the big appeal
>> if it?
>
> It's a non-orthogonal router with good performance metrics.  The description is
> academic but it looks not too hard to add keep-out areas, additional costs to
> the cost functions, etc.  I don't know how far Stefan ever got with
> those real-life
> features.  I've lost the paper its based on but it was fairly readable.

Ok thanks.

> Britton



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -