delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-TCPREMOTEIP: | 63.119.35.194 |
X-Authenticated-UID: | jpd AT noqsi DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) |
Subject: | Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization (was: Re: [geda-user] Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared 3rd rail) Re: [geda-user] Antifork) |
From: | John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <CAM2RGhTDNMBQiCkuB4kc2+0k8t9Xs+yOOCyc6Tk_CEAqKmFS+g@mail.gmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:13:15 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <60866F2E-0014-4F02-A359-315F1A80D893@noqsi.com> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl> <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhTDNMBQiCkuB4kc2+0k8t9Xs+yOOCyc6Tk_CEAqKmFS+g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailer: | Apple Mail (2.1878.6) |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7PMDLB4019175 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Aug 25, 2015, at 2:32 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: >> >> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >> >>> The drive is low too: even with the clumsy modelling John likes to keep bashing pcb for, it works surprisingly well in practice. >> >> I think part of our problem is that if pcb makes sense to you, gschem does not, and vice-versa. > > Looking at the sourcecode I agree 100% > Looking at the UI I disagree 100%. I wasn’t thinking UI or source code. What matters is the underlying abstractions. Gschem constructs schematics by composition of a few elementary kinds of objects with simple properties. Pcb constructs layouts by concatenation of complicated objects with odd properties that interact in complicated ways. > >> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. >> http://www.noqsi.com/ >> jpd AT noqsi DOT com >> >> >> > > > > -- > Home > http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ > Work > http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |