X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=i2RKCNWvghxPj6HmaejqhQoRO9xQkcYkGP8JNculr1M=;
	b=H+/sOBTdp4bVTUAKwa+8cMPz21SB2qZ2GRQHsA59Ud6MshimOVq2Uz/pFF1QK55yk0
	p1ua43NDlAVMwYK6azP5WQ6LBIZpYC3cuXFbbcgZMPyGqxX9MjsK614k0s370agYHLvH
	ZswQp11nAD54glPcceTxpc5fZ7XmAli3+wS7WrItvk9H1j0RJKMP+gTQTvLltQ1NCD94
	7Ow2kPmJiotM0PjA7Q81bgUZf1E2nnffiM3WBQYkAmvK7/1+lOlpHQqqaG+5zZkDuYSq
	qNT7xJ829aPkoWDiK1IOOYKr0ygyxXQ0XmqtYj6RlTjz/AYbtCZ+tsyIQS3fnt0iYKxg
	6mVg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.30.73 with SMTP id q9mr27521419lah.31.1440527572872;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl>
	<6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:32:52 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTDNMBQiCkuB4kc2+0k8t9Xs+yOOCyc6Tk_CEAqKmFS+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization (was: Re: [geda-user]
	Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared 3rd rail) Re:
	[geda-user] Antifork)
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:51 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>>  The drive is low too: even with the clumsy modelling John likes to keep bashing pcb for, it works surprisingly well in practice.
>
> I think part of our problem is that if pcb makes sense to you, gschem does not, and vice-versa.

Looking at the sourcecode I agree 100%
Looking at the UI I disagree 100%.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -