delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:50 AM, myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote: > On 25/08/15 14:25, John Doty wrote: >> Perhaps not so much you, but much of the “let’s make gschem better” that I see here is really “let’s make gschem more like pcb”. And, of course, the reason I find pcb such a horror is that it is not like gschem in its design. > Isn't the whole idea in this thread "let's make gschem/pcb more accessible”? Yes, but the answer looks *completely* different depending on whether you’re coming from a pcb (integrated tool) or geda-gaf (toolkit) perspective. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |