X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared
	3rd rail) Re: [geda-user] Antifork
In-Reply-To:	<55DC2A83.3090100@jump-ing.de>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508251108130.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl> <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <55DC2A83 DOT 3090100 AT jump-ing DOT de>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>
> There is ever only one reason for a fork: if the mainstream distribution disallows changes.

Translation to English: "everyone should work exactly the way I order." 
And this is considered the good attitude, right? I'm really glad that 
free software licenses are wiser than this.

- Raw text -