delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=T1nGoyji6cf7F65YjGGoV5ttpnV6WK/oo5Fd+H9FVQ4=; | |
b=mikfJtkf1pkI8YwSC3DzDzxZdPcHwLC6HStOTkbvX8uVIST2yIVOFFZoniidbrEI1G | |
MOP5/s6YZ65F2VWuMVOQd9N+gnhYV/5EgbENvyJsbGeyxzWq7Z/55anO6zCo34rec0Q2 | |
DrE6nZDyqio8cTNt2A3L0K5rmiUbBCBsAfKkUuh5si83ADKTI4hvOcPQXB63rRcZxQ3q | |
lomo4mh0iFDG2+yLBlWYx0Gi2/1L+AMi4KOitBBBe83iG1+tpFSccnuWgfASbV7NERpS | |
ALlU+gVn9QNso3CskdljmD7rGZvNppT/i0R+T2MIFtgZg3tYIdO5o/q0Zxznw3o+TjSM | |
NT5w== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.107.130.28 with SMTP id e28mr28148980iod.77.1440493150698; |
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <20150825104641.9f1ba6623db9fda707c7cdc7@gmail.com> |
References: | <20150824223846 DOT 0ba61ba7 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> |
<CAM2RGhTHd-ZLc5m7gWkPoGczUbkFEtikdwgin0=HJnV0AcGEmg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<201508250312 DOT t7P3CIUG027159 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<CACwWb3By=-TK8TMpPaauFXTrtkwGvDcQABsgcF3eAU-hkWh-VQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<20150825104641 DOT 9f1ba6623db9fda707c7cdc7 AT gmail DOT com> | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:59:10 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <CACwWb3B-anihu4jpeM0-GyMOM3zXYx87g15B2+ejkb-zYtCpqA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] pcb file format |
From: | "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--001a113fb7008c808d051e1ef2bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes, That is why I define the new file format and data structure, which enables this feature. :-) On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Nicklas Karlsson ( nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > I think there may be cases then you want a polygon on the silkscreen. > Sometimes it is useful to add graphics on some extra layer for example to > mark the area for conformal coating. > > > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:27:05 +0200 > "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" < > geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > > Okay. I want to clarify one thing. I have full respect for gEDA > developers. > > I have made lots of boards with gEDA. > > > > But I think we have to move on. > > > > AFAIK in footprints, one can not have silkscreen ploygons. > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think (DJ is the authority here) our current file architecture does > > > > not do ovals > > > > > > We do round-ended rectangles (i.e. for tssop pads), square and round, > > > and octagons. > > > > > > > > With this data format, one can define arbitrary footprints. No > > > restrictions > > > > > like "no silkscreen polygons". > > > > > > > > To be fair to DJ and the other authors those are not arbitrary. Folks > > > > just kind of coded themselves into a corner. > > > > > > And we do have silkscreen polygons ;-) > > > > --001a113fb7008c808d051e1ef2bf Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr">Yes, That is why I define the new file format and data str= ucture, which enables this feature. :-)<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"= ><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Nicklas K= arlsson (<a href=3D"mailto:nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com">nicklas.karlsson17= @gmail.com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT del= orie.com</a>] <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com= " target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockqu= ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s= olid;padding-left:1ex">I think there may be cases then you want a polygon o= n the silkscreen. Sometimes it is useful to add graphics on some extra laye= r for example to mark the area for conformal coating.<br> <div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br> <br> <br> <br> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:27:05 +0200<br> "Levente (<a href=3D"mailto:leventelist AT gmail DOT com">leventelist AT gmail DOT c= om</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com= </a>]" <<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie.= com</a>> wrote:<br> <br> > Okay. I want to clarify one thing. I have full respect for gEDA develo= pers.<br> > I have made lots of boards with gEDA.<br> ><br> > But I think we have to move on.<br> ><br> > AFAIK in footprints, one can not have silkscreen ploygons.<br> ><br> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 AM, DJ Delorie <<a href=3D"mailto:dj AT d= elorie.com">dj AT delorie DOT com</a>> wrote:<br> ><br> > ><br> > > > I think (DJ is the authority here) our current file architec= ture does<br> > > > not do ovals<br> > ><br> > > We do round-ended rectangles (i.e. for tssop pads), square and ro= und,<br> > > and octagons.<br> > ><br> > > > > With this data format, one can define arbitrary footpri= nts. No<br> > > restrictions<br> > > > > like "no silkscreen polygons".<br> > > ><br> > > > To be fair to DJ and the other authors those are not arbitra= ry. Folks<br> > > > just kind of coded themselves into a corner.<br> > ><br> > > And we do have silkscreen polygons ;-)<br> > ><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> --001a113fb7008c808d051e1ef2bf--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |