X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=HpXwiIV0+RVgYR5bkoi2fTKaA/pWFYfPXWHezVKZWco=;
	b=dVY9viuyaqE2dz/zhv06U/ZN9TfpCKhRNOKupyxKESA7fWhDoW0bQncvpXAyVUlgfK
	qeCR307tB502fUU5C9Ikmj80+lBdtbRDRBNYpBK35i451dXBrWG/JhvU4Yxbw7BXSga/
	P0GqSPTATDL+0dBIbDIvo/jniw9xT2sh7rV3VJhLjVqlQ6qTatqWJhEDin2O3qfBz12H
	ELGLGQ1KOXoh0O3lc3trjzLFtqCyDfQLYvepc3YQ5w0vsS2Emm/5zGibXzVIXwnJY2bi
	JkV7sEHm8DzbsrUOICSdDmDqs/R1dqtuqXrOJrLVMOx9yEtsK0upc47KLTuK2OAMN6sd
	y8Dw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.210.6 with SMTP id mq6mr18002022lbc.83.1440385076872;
	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508240350330.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSC6UfCr8ixF5iuffmUhcdgVuz9nA+YjiZNk8-f7Q5r-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231935040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSNRHrimsD7_dwg2kPxP=kMjt7xWNCd76TVBGqjPGOuSQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508240350330 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 02:57:56 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhSfLYAYZJYcMucfNdg+PmwrzvC-9=NqTouG5uSyfJQU1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:55 AM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> As I said it is about not diluting programming effort across
>> forks/branches/what ever of PCB. I get that you want your own fork and
>> that is cool. You made it off of the PCB source. Why do you object to
>> people bringing your additions back to PCB? I kind of feel like this
>> has gotten compeditive (pcb vs pcb-rnd) and I can not see why.
>
>
> I don't object to people merge my stuff to mainline (or anywhere else). I
> only said I wouldn't do the merge myself and I wouldn't push it either, for
> I don't use mainline PCB.

And that is primarily why I help you by testing it. It is also all I
was really advocating sorry about the confusion.

> I even stated that mainline developers could regard pcb-rnd as a testlab of
> features and benefit from it.

Now you have me wondering how many other branches/forks are out there
which are holding viable stuff. I guess I had written it off too
quickly before.

> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -