delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=IX8A7OSPlzVKY/2PIKfrX1hX82pfnb2udEO3iPhIDZk=; | |
b=tGjM74CWqRkwos+phECHv89yJpb6HvKoSdmFXlQpaJ8yzAA4/Mgg7mnkHewLzq6Ao1 | |
SxnHZwKN6BlilA/ICMcMOlG74c2vc1G1Ssv0+c7+SodlyG8LUPf8hfJ6PN41qnSx+ebP | |
2TsgHgeMl4xcbjkOKkeEReRmrCTAndgETSkFLcAlx/CqImrwksqPDZdsJFhKYypIsEX1 | |
hLO/ttmQZp/dYsD0DY07uqJfZv2WbBygyfaO/y6S3YsONr/zMqsLQVij5Jg+UPoxHpYr | |
JefRvWwvgFgdIazz1E+aUW10xdBx6P7uHneCxxwSItxyt6EZxTcqBZDT0/LSx03PKTql | |
0jmw== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.112.159.226 with SMTP id xf2mr16546176lbb.74.1440362208944; |
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <55DA2B4B.1010104@iae.nl> |
References: | <55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> |
<CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
<55D9BB90 DOT 5020708 AT iae DOT nl> | |
<201508231651 DOT t7NGpEVt030026 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<55DA2B4B DOT 1010104 AT iae DOT nl> | |
Date: | Sun, 23 Aug 2015 20:36:48 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhSNTJcvDKO8RCFmRQDM8X8Goee8yu7-YryEbLt=5-WKUg@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Antifork |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:21 PM, myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote: >>>> There's probably nothing wrong with that, but if that's the case, I >>>> find it natural that developers find it more motivating to develope >>>> for themselves than for the "crowd" - at least, that's the effect on me. >>> >>> And this will be the dead of pcb. >> >> All the pcb developers have made it clear that they work on pcb for >> selfish reasons, this is nothing new. I wish more users were >> motivated to work on it for selfish reasons. > > > Absolutely! But if "working for me" automatically means "not working > together" I think any project will die. Seconded with die substituted for slowed down. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |