X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:42:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhSC6UfCr8ixF5iuffmUhcdgVuz9nA+YjiZNk8-f7Q5r-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508231935040.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSC6UfCr8ixF5iuffmUhcdgVuz9nA+YjiZNk8-f7Q5r-A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>>
>>
>> What exactly does make you think that?
>
> Igor2 the only alternative (which I am no opposed to) is that we drop
> the current mainline and use pcb-rnd going forward.

I still don't see why we need to drop either of them. Do we drop pcb and 
go for kicad? Or do we drop kicad and go for pcb? Or rather both pcb and 
kicad exist and will go on existing...

We have a mainline with all the opengl support which seems to be very 
popular, and pcb-rnd with scripting. You can even combine them: do your 
design in pcb and load it in pcb-rnd when you want to run interactive 
scripts on it.

It's like that use case reported some weeks ago: use the gtk HID for most 
edits and use the lesstif HID for whatever feature that works better 
there.


>>>
>>> With this attitude it's clearly subject to bit rotting. If OpenGL doesn't
>>> work well it needs fixing, not abandoning.
>
> That is what worries me.

I really can't do more than offer commit rights in the repo so you can get 
it to work. If everyone needs it but noone does it, it just won't happen.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -