X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:05:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Antifork
In-Reply-To:	<55D9EB62.7020802@ecosensory.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508231800360.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9EB62 DOT 7020802 AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, John Griessen wrote:

> On 08/22/2015 11:46 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:> The strange phenomenon is 
> that many people are willing to express their strong opinion on what features 
> are needed in pcb-rnd (or
>> in pcb, on this regard we may consider pcb-rnd as a test lab from pcb's 
> perspective), but when it comes to actually compiling and
>> running a new version, only a very few invest the time.
>
> I resemble that remark.  This last week I could not divert to do compile and 
> try out even though I was a voter
> in igor2's poll.
>

No problem. I think I used the wrong wording. I didn't mean to blame 
anyone or even imply that if someone voted in the poll he has to try my 
stuff.

I only tried to share my observation about the general lack of user 
activity that I think affects all forks (including the mainline). I also 
tried to propose my idea of a no-compile package (an idea that may benefit 
mainline pcb as well). Too bad the whole thread got derailed.

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -