X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:47:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [flamewar] Antifork
In-Reply-To:	<55D9E63C.9080606@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1508231738100.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<55D8D8B8 DOT 7050907 AT jump-ing DOT de> <CAM2RGhSZ1vi_DFKqZdZYxhto4ZaXLLscBt5m5kk+PH2ZoYW_vw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508230609370 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9BDC7 DOT 4000608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231450350 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9D019 DOT 6040305 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508231603200 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55D9E63C DOT 9080606 AT xs4all DOT nl>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hello Bert,

On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

<snip>

> If you are willing to contribute to pcb upstream I thank you in advance.

The extent I can contribute to:

- I always make microcommits

- I tried to refrain from "noisy" modifications, e.g. whitespace cleanup, 
formatting changes, unrelated "this could be done better" changes, so 
diffs should be clean and to the point

- I tried to accurately mark each commit with a feature tag in the commit 
message so it should be easy to collect the changes related to a specific 
feature. I also have detailed per feature docmentation (even online) and a 
list of the major features (online too) so it'd be easy to pick the 
interesting ones.

- explain any time why or how a feature is implemented, answer questions, 
explain the code, etc; realtime on IRC or via email.

I know it's much less than doing merges with upstream and sending 
ready-to-use patches, but I rather invest my time in more features than 
merging (sorry).

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -