delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Virus-Scanned: | amavisd-new at neurotica.com |
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: | I do not consent to surveillance, prick |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; |
s=default; t=1439407074; | |
bh=cj5pGzSeAFPQ0ZYJBicLn3QkQnwa7qOSIlLVPMB/N8g=; | |
h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; | |
b=VoxCgPzFwkr9OdtLUCAjJaiLdr7D2bvhLxZlSVxls0EN4w+FiVXRR5lSBwWKMfU/e | |
D4GjW6lNoZLWTJa32Z5pY+b5E6Ug5QlUbLU2ZqApakaimeYVutqPM6R8Ehq0LZc0/H | |
N057Q+HjYDlKio/M+taZWNxzQXVI18nutOOIw244= | |
Message-ID: | <55CB9BE2.6010507@neurotica.com> |
Date: | Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:17:54 -0400 |
From: | "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] multiple gEDA users sharing networked libraries |
References: | <55CB4F8A DOT 9020506 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <20150812174418 DOT 2470 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <55CB90E3 DOT 3050103 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150812185403 DOT 7774 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> |
In-Reply-To: | <20150812185403.7774.qmail@stuge.se> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
On 08/12/2015 02:54 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> The pros are that everyone has access to the same symbols and parts. >>> >>> The cons are that noone can work unless the server is online. >> >> If your server is offline for more than a few moments in this day and >> age, you need to fire either your admin or your upstream provider. > > All environments are not equal, blanket statements aren't useful. Ok, I'll call you on that. As a sometimes-network architect and administrator now, and a full time++ network architect administrator in a previous life, I feel qualified to categorically assert that, if a given machine is designated a "server", it had damn well better have decent uptime. If someone cannot achieve that in this day and age, even in a backwater on a generator and a trash-picked computer, there is something very, very wrong. And if that "server" can't be kept up, the solution is simple and takes mere minutes: move to one that is. I remind you that this is 2015. Datacenter-grade hardware is available for free on every trash day in every developed and half-developed country on the planet. There are a few blanket statements, and I stand by them. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |