X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=qboWINZvfCPFmgCcoua6NjWeTPx+mHd+sJOnsow8/28=;
	b=ykzz7WFHm/1DIIo4aE3d6eO+A9ZfvjgHK+d2KQhees4SyV4wcjgYIUmmhPi4Uvzmjg
	fvAfU1nlIV0QroHIJ5XxRY3sYcJ04EahMnhzWM7qq3iaNVCqBpfDV0EHKx5s+wx2lO0k
	rjpqd7a9DAi3EkP66r9Fhy9TVVRoO8tioeilR4bIDLKIajybdORf37P1h5okPcUALKmq
	1RWRx5j9NMgexRhjMbtfudvXS/JA7NE9EOWb8cJI0Mr+GCj6pv2AWnkXXg/iHUeELpQ3
	KWF+G8u7O4hhOs8gsIUuq2zZhTLG4YsX/I1BLXEUh/VmWgDw8Dsavr+fPbX05W0UwwwX
	wd8A==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.182.73.170 with SMTP id m10mr12568999obv.22.1438533369463;
	Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<631C0577-E61D-40BC-B200-96BA897092E6@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<FF2A0FBC-75B1-4A3E-9588-CD3DB7CC448A AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<5329D15C-0713-4919-8205-AC474BAC5652 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_bRzahs66fCYsuNggvuwy0-JxGbTu8EJsGwaeSVB8G-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FFA87469-7432-49C7-8AF5-153C41DFE78F AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAC4O8c9241Z8A6-kKTQM6f=CTxtTU_-Dmj9uMOqqmp68_OuZxg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<BC57B367-8548-4947-B29C-A69378423BA8 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<631C0577-E61D-40BC-B200-96BA897092E6 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Date:	Sun, 2 Aug 2015 12:36:09 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAOFvGD5mKEWO9oJpK2HPvLLgAPGB_2YW2vq6hSdqSF-Wkz0TuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Improved Find
From:	"Jason White (whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Edward Hennessy
(ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 2, 2015, at 8:01 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> Making gschem more module-oriented is an invitation to confusion.
>
> What is the definition of module in he context of gschem?
>
> Ed

I'm not sure, I think John Doty was probably misinterpreting my
suggestion on launchpad.

-- 
Jason White

- Raw text -