X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=2Qo81L423CEvZ9eDUuEeJLnKjV9YrNxy1fXfcnlQ3H4=;
	b=XNH7ora66WeIURV9G23wTCehAmbMPADoPZVNTpxb+K/pApgdpobH1tynov2YJB+5TL
	FanZoLK6+r2XGxabaCmW2Tb5t5i8SxPzNNzNEYLPf5Ox1NLuHmhesD/0w0OE+cNHgKaP
	We5pT3CfgtSi7bq7ld5LnrWU05U4LGJrzS5NTG3cqUSIpyFid1Ll74i4prBRKnaPCjLW
	993SMoqoECkGGInWGqh0DEzoE8lv649BVn3sucDnq6QNvlq9bHFJ0UKS5SF9xrCrBBNr
	fVNhMGVsGXdamS1o6BHVSmOTXaO3hpuidz8Agk4uponn/lj+U77c1eL3FyG43kUmgHNE
	44jQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.23.194 with SMTP id o2mr20789657wjf.63.1438472444947;
	Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<FFA87469-7432-49C7-8AF5-153C41DFE78F@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<FF2A0FBC-75B1-4A3E-9588-CD3DB7CC448A AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<5329D15C-0713-4919-8205-AC474BAC5652 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c_bRzahs66fCYsuNggvuwy0-JxGbTu8EJsGwaeSVB8G-Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FFA87469-7432-49C7-8AF5-153C41DFE78F AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Date:	Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:40:44 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c9241Z8A6-kKTQM6f=CTxtTU_-Dmj9uMOqqmp68_OuZxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Improved Find
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Edward Hennessy
(ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice if the results could be shown in tree form.  Often you're
>> looking for a particular instance or two and don't want to visit them all.
>> Position in the tree is a useful and easy criteria when you go to mentally
>> prune the search results.  In practice as long as the file name is there
>> that's almost as good, I'm not sure if knowing tree position is worth the
>> extra effort or not.
>
> The tree form is a good idea. Would you mind adding a description to defect #698793 in Launchpad?

I don't know, in thinking it over I recall issue others raise that it's
actually possibly a DAG so tree view could be a misleading or else redundant
representation.  Not sure there's anything to be done about that with the
standard Gtk widgets, and DAG views are ugly at best compared to flat lists
anyway.  Discretion might be the better part of valor here.  Users probably
have subcirc hierarchy positions pretty well memorized anyway so filename
is enough.

Britton

- Raw text -