delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=y8L1XqamTHSwo6kpAzZrrhvimjDnAiuIM6GsA5oTWQE=; | |
b=GP6whA6nKXVTes6NyZ2wqe5h2wzO+YgUNjCqc3tSiDCEHi7Oa+oTLjOlye7ctQIvnT | |
HmkvU1q7gwD4TCMPAnkLWcfF25+q5HEWc9QnlgodrAhVrmdVX4wrM+HyIBG/aKsDUcp0 | |
M/jMjX6mW4Ob2j/o2/Utn+pvvFCJNa1T+ScOhpHmuczCG6pGkvL4Pz/WF1fTFwz7KhrO | |
i/jC4HnDGnvtfBW8S5g8roqY4IDCxGmOnCGhcUH+Srogi2e5851ZFHH3cUU2RE35DLHQ | |
5C9NUCd+2L3quK1+Zdp0RY8IW6fK0zYJbUga8rj2ErenYr0vaI/tB1O7zkYzJ4gLpbuI | |
6MYA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.152.7.206 with SMTP id l14mr44150801laa.3.1438267694451; |
Thu, 30 Jul 2015 07:48:14 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <201507290313.t6T3D15d026939@envy.delorie.com> |
References: | <CAOP4iL3PR9Yu1g+iKbQqkYY-pLYBvFFfRUDKmiYhLZTQH0Tbag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507290419490 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
<201507290247 DOT t6T2lYPF025964 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
<20150729030520 DOT 3437 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> | |
<201507290313 DOT t6T3D15d026939 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:48:14 -0400 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhQL4L51ouoTufZxSHgbmObEprcfRJAJUTN+nC3xfbJLRw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA fail metrics |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:13 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >> DJ Delorie wrote: >> > I feel that way about cmake - it might be a good system, but since >> > I don't know it, I avoid things that use it. >> >> Doesn't that say a lot more about you than about cmake? > > That's the point. cmake isn't as popular, people don't know how to > use it, so given the choice, they avoid it. Hence, "popularity > contest". GNU Make may not always be the best tool for the job, but > more people are familiar with it and thus comfortable using it. More > people == more potential contributors. > > We're having a similar conversation about guile - whether it's the > right language for the job is only one consideration; whether most of > our users feel comfortable using it is another. I find it funny how people fight over which language is better or which VCS but no one really cares or wants to care about what make they have. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |