X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=26yI6T7Kd32N4gPZEYTWVxB+1LMILzSkKnZxp8N80BY=;
	b=R69UqbS8Nj0aIX3k+2Yl70r5L2ZZLVAg2knG1XFXcZfThuR8fDv+8Q8WhE9tgjHWrX
	WzlIbycccqWqg9EH5uGUJQHsoz3Y6+zOKbZ6fV3eM+1Kjcrpe5pMvQpZhglQFYhaYhhr
	BsWuq2r5r0FsUzFHW6VWIQMRH5HAIiTkVyjm7lfeuwTNQod40RwdV0dviH9KAQA9Mtss
	VJ6oRQFFCqkoDevs3ZO9otD7v8oPk4j1RM+iGLkNqtNA+Fjv+Q4RhrzFuv31h/tzGKbF
	WoFnqTkdmtxS8FtIZB0vHEmpd6NtAfqxvtQI7qOpKUPIKNqH/RjR+q7D6QhYtfBeyyWQ
	CT2w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.124.164 with SMTP id mj4mr33946588lbb.3.1437506089218;
	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16@noqsi.com>
References:	<1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus>
	<3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:14:49 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTnhNJhiNrX2m=1t3uacj4LkKD45qsL+L9fzuFAkT_SSA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6LJEr2B030937
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:16 PM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 06:48 -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>> Ugh. Can’t we just keep it *simple* rather than adding more crazy ways
>>
>> My suggestion would make nothing harder for the user: Maybe something
>> like a checkmark in the toolbar that turns green when user select menu
>> item "build netlist" and turns red when after this action the user
>> changes connection of nets segments.
>
> But it still introduces more ways for the tool to go wrong. Anther unnecessary feature hiding the necessary ones. Please don’t recreate the the kind of complexity I fled from when I adopted gEDA. Features may seem benign until you start tripping over the unexpected interactions and clutter.
>
>> For my own tool the problem is,
>> that it can currently not generate netlists at all, so I will leave that
>> feature to later releases. But I think gschem can use gnetlist to
>> generate a netlist, so only some code for comparing netlists (checksum?)
>> is necessary, and an red/green indicator.
>
> Why not a separate tool?

There really should be a tool that just lets you do a visual diff.
Then you get to decide if you want to make the changes. I mean who
wants to look at a netlist for a schematic that is already in front of
them? It is easier to compare apples to apples.

> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -