X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=egy4x82Ht8ThUA0887q8QYnsc/6WVTji4MAYDAEx4j0=;
	b=vnOY0R9Sgz6mv8LsndfsncYa5TbWFp89BkA1IJuztDQze3SeTjD2eZCEGCT/ZkQBfd
	4KX8u9AX21aqIyazgp26BrbPw76HabRLxtwH8Eu30ntOC7bOJyL+WUSu6CiZ5v/BPwRw
	IkFREzAypgDQdcwWMZgin3GHeO/lA4bRL3yIVtuY6RijJLfwRkHqpWV39YKNiI4/9SzE
	Ik5LRpqGKv0jugADqE6IF2O//opi6GIrnYcVVbsvIb/JoQTQhrasFyuNVly7cDdVEEY2
	5X5zxEPQag3JsLZOprhJtACvrYOQnGEWLk30oWg4sEII0M8BoeZKqaOJBoTj+4gch48y
	L7gw==
X-Received:	by 10.112.199.133 with SMTP id jk5mr20626744lbc.32.1437246774555;
	Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:12:52 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Difference between attached and detached attributes
Message-ID:	<20150718191252.GA26941@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<55A813B5 DOT 4040609 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150716210154 DOT GD14931 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<55A95B75 DOT 9080306 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150718071044 DOT GA2685 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<55AA8CA0 DOT 2050905 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<55AA8CA0.2050905@sbcglobal.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Girvin R. Herr (gherr375 AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/18/2015 12:10 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >Hi, Girvin.
> >
> >On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:45:57PM -0700, Girvin R. Herr (gherr375 AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >...
> >>So, if I understand you correctly, the short answer is that all attributes
> >>are detached except for pin attributes, which are attached to the pin.  That
> >>seems logical.  I was thinking along the lines of all attributes are
> >Yes. For a component (that is, for a symbol added on schematic) the
> >detached attributes being in the symbol are promoted and become attached
> >to the component.
> If I am reading this correctly, this implies that only detached attributes
> are promoted.  Attached attributes are not.  True?

Yes.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -