X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Net attributes
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201507162123.t6GLNlqR029844@envy.delorie.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:45:18 -0600
Message-Id:	<27634B69-446A-4BA7-B05B-0F9436DF694F@noqsi.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhS=5xq0_oN4e0M55Kor4bcnXNn3NfLvRZoi7Vw9Aq1ZXg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A41B30 DOT 50602 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507151114560 DOT 2113 AT nimbus> <254F9AFE-1A3E-4D88-BABF-E6E0F87A56B1 AT icloud DOT com> <1436960577 DOT 1072 DOT 6 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <EE9F72D6-E17A-4F5C-8E9E-45F12C901C9F AT noqsi DOT com> <201507151820 DOT t6FIKYME001704 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201507152007 DOT t6FK7lv8005229 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <24AD56C6-B7C2-4D7E-B69A-F68DBACCBFDC AT noqsi DOT com> <4DD9C29A-2105-45DC-9F17-82DA23433919 AT icloud DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507160907360 DOT 3383 AT nimbus> <55A7D999 DOT 5020101 AT ecosensory DOT com!
	! ! > <CAOP4iL2koQTZe03R8g8eWfTO4sTPoGNyjvi_+c4eCFExd=udWA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <74093FC3-C9AA-4AFF-A158-720676E70E49 AT noqsi DOT com> <201507162045 DOT t6GKj06r028442 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <8F26D2B2-3724-4264-B8A4-933E9377306D AT noqsi DOT com> <201507162123 DOT t6GLNlqR029844 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6GLjPZo017947
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jul 16, 2015, at 3:23 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> 
>> Nope. I sometimes have to make multiple copies of a subcircuit
>> schematic: same topology but different components. Having more
>> control over hierarchy expansion in gnetlist would be good.
> 
> I was thinking about the m4 problem in pcb and thought "I wonder if we
> could put a generic expression parser in where we expect simple
> values".  I don't think it would help much for pcb (without a looping
> construct, at least), but it might help for heirarchical schematics if
> a component could have a value that was an expression referencing
> inherited attributes from the parent.

Inherited attributes would be nice. Needs a new mechanism in code few understand, though.

>  The schematic flattener (if
> you're flattening it for netlisting, for example) would expand the
> expression.
> 
> Part of me says "put a guile expression there" but that opens up the
> problem of having a schematic with executable code in it.

I�ve considered, for similar purposes, making a tiny recursive top-down interpreter for ordinary arithmetic expressions in Guile. Such things are not difficult to write. That would keep the executable code genie in the bottle.

>  Given the
> nature of electronics, a mathematical (TeX? Mathematica?) expression
> would be more natural, but bring its own can of worms�
> 

If you�re specifying discrete part values, one tricky issue is specifying the catalog of acceptable values.


John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -