delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
> On 15 Jul 2015, at 23:20, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: > > >> On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:40 PM, Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: >> >> >>> On 15 Jul 2015, at 22:22, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Trace widths was just a real-world example of where this might be useful. >>> >>> After years of dealing with DJ, I simply don’t believe that was his intent. If it was, he could easily have stated it in a more general way. >> >> Which just proves that you went off half-cocked in response to an email that you didn't even bother to read properly. DJ was not part of that discussion. The 'trace widths' was a problem raised by Dave McGuire, which Roland Lutz and I then briefly discussed how to solve in a clean, general manner. > > You wanted to change gschem, but no change is required. The problem is to give gnetlist a way to see net segments and their attributes. I have *never* opposed giving gnetlist better views into the schematic data. Indeed, I encourage all such efforts. Yes, a change is required in gschem. At the moment gschem automatically condenses all continuous, straight line net segments into a single net line. We need to stop this, or at least allow it to be overridden. Chris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |