delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:31 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2015, at 6:24 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > snip > >> or being needlessly complex. The opposition to *any* change has made >> this more difficult than it should be. > > No, it *should* be difficult. Geda-gaf is a mature, stable, useful toolkit. Ill-considered change is bad. Adding features to software is like adding mass to aircraft: not always bad, but there’d better be very strong justification. Respectfully that is just obstructionist since we can undo basically anything except user expectation. >> >> PCB's importer is an example of that. We improved the existing tools >> to implement a significant convenience feature, and made it easy for >> the user to use. This doesn't prevent you from using the old gsc2pcb >> if you want. >> > > But that itself reflects pcb’s inflexibility. If you could import netlists from 20 other tools, you’d want those interfaces factored out, I think. I certainly would. How do you know this is not a prelude to that being done by someone else? It might not be on DJ's radar but I can see the EDAcore initiative doing it, heck it seems like their mission statement. > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |