X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore:	I do not consent to surveillance, prick
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1436912200;
	bh=FgREw50eBrbEOSBMbm462y5Cl26xMQld/cc5Ks093X8=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=dUe+x4AQa5VFhehLhUZFQfLXXjVf11vg9IvcuF4u2fNNMhybegoTKHqBpZlC8Yz0W
	BDuZSLjyv2PI3Nzg2X3UxFiCmGRpZyi/RtNinDY1kq0eEe5EVEP8hz3ppo4/4bz691
	ktryUqt/SmsahEg4HQIT1naVWX5RmQsLWGpzTblU=
Message-ID:	<55A58A48.80501@neurotica.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:16:40 -0400
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: geda-gaf on FreeBSD and probably other architectures
References:	<1507142204 DOT AA17911 AT ivan DOT Harhan DOT ORG>
In-Reply-To:	<1507142204.AA17911@ivan.Harhan.ORG>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/14/2015 06:04 PM, Spacefalcon the Outlaw wrote:
>> But isn't there a datestamp in the ELF files anyway?
> 
> That's COFF, not ELF.  COFF objects and executables do have a POSIX
> timestamp field in the header, but not ELF.
> 
> On a Slackware Linux 13.37 machine:
> 
> gcc -O2 -o hello1 hello.c
> sleep 2
> gcc -O2 -o hello2 hello.c
> diff hello1 hello2
> 
> The two binaries come out identical.

  Ok, thanks for the correction.  I could've sworn ELF had a timestamp
in them as well.  I haven't had to dig through any ELF files in awhile.
(thank goodness ;))

             -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -