delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Envelope-From: | paubert AT iram DOT es |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:57:59 +0200 |
From: | "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD) |
Message-ID: | <20150714065758.GB9338@visitor2.iram.es> |
References: | <76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> |
<1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> | |
<79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA AT icloud DOT com> | |
<CAOP4iL0dWqVnAXRSfYKRW4BknJ5WK5oFceSg7TWcb3m57oUesA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<mo1n1e$mh3$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <mo1n1e$mh3$1@ger.gmane.org> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
X-Spamina-Bogosity: | Unsure |
X-Spamina-Spam-Score: | -0.2 (/) |
X-Spamina-Spam-Report: | Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) |
pts rule name description | |
---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- | |
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP | |
0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% | |
[score: 0.4759] | |
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. | |
See | |
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block | |
for more information. | |
[URIs: gmane.org] | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:01:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45- > Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w AT public DOT gmane DOT org) [via geda-user- > Ht4Cp5ncgjRBDgjK7y7TUQ AT public DOT gmane DOT org] wrote: > > > I'm > > surprised that no one has applied autorouting to schematic capture, > > That would really be usefull. > > Schematic capture serves two purposes. It is the way the electronics > designer tells the computer about the connections he needs in the > netlist. And it also is meant to present the topology of the circuit > to the human eye as comprehensibly as possible. A readable schematic > asks for much more than "connect all these pins with lines". > > An auto router needs to be told which pins to connect. In other words, > it needs a netlist. But it is the main purpose of schematic capture to > create a netlist in the first place. Indeed, but at least a tool to help fixup non right-angle nets would be a first step, and it must be doable. There was such a tool back when I used OrCAD or a 286. BTW, a long time ago I protested because there was no dot when 3 or 4 pins coincided without a net segment. The bug was fixed at some point but is now back. Gabriel
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |