delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=HyQgLu0EhC4ECgWNE+yKHyAGl+TxytUmrOKepSlyoac=; | |
b=UV6R2isV4mwyjhaa0XrDTQ//9Yg7NKTsJIGCwjIEUvtv+JfUxvoAcAXbLxXdPOuJmV | |
bkRDQpRxjWhKXRhcYkKp7yup337UnSxnoyxbrDKvEE/96NenWEssU3e1JkHzUliwlfnJ | |
64pRVx7ys4mooxydvCuxSV/h04nH79oOKxPWqlOBVWgXFHhW5gHGZHtPX6hmdpE/UD1a | |
uYMew/TEv4bKoy54ZZDfjR83B8nVdPPyil3OJ2DTec22nb+xjUKqlB69nsJtPgkkQbKq | |
Gp/rQlyiNS73ansFU/ud6SrqocRPuekfOsFWj6QbdTPUWrqW+SNRddWg48j4hOsbzPhw | |
OK1w== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.152.37.102 with SMTP id x6mr35216921laj.69.1436843043408; |
Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:04:03 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <mo1rd7$oef$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<mnv04v$if0$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<0A5D410F-D1EF-4FC6-AF0F-BB13218B1615 AT icloud DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507131000330 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
<mo1rd7$oef$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:04:03 +0000 |
Message-ID: | <CAM2RGhRa_V2S4k+YmrrNpDg5hjTTsoANy3zT0Oj9k_H0QVCBag@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] The new to do |
From: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> wrote: > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > >> I had such an effort years ago. It was a standalone plugin for PCB >> of the time. It used GPMI to support multiple languages - not >> requiring all of them installed, but letting the user install >> language plugins. It supported all the languages you listed above >> (gpmi even has a guile backend!). >> >> Unfortunately it did not attract any user. I think only a very few >> people are actually interested in scripting PCB (other than with the >> builtin action language). > > IMHO, the ability to script just every action and even the UI on a > user level is one of the strengths of eagle. I get the impression that > scripting is used a lot by seasoned eagle users. The way eagle does it > with its own exclusive languages (plural!) is a different story > though. I'd recommend a look at freeCAD for a more convincing example > on how to tackle scripting in a CAD environment. > > IMHO, to get widely adopted scripting must be readily available in the > default install of the suite. Plus, its use must be covered by the > manual, by howtos and by first-steps. When these conditions are met. > scripting can get quite an asset. Indeed scripting can be an very powerful. The catch is we have to fix some underpinnings. > ---<)kaimartin(>--- > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |