delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: | http://gmane.org/ |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de> |
Subject: | Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
Date: | Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:45:11 +0200 |
Lines: | 14 |
Message-ID: | <mo1pj8$pdf$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436400557 DOT 676 DOT 46 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <mnv2jl$699$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <201507130239 DOT t6D2dkoO011392 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org |
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: | a89-182-147-107.net-htp.de |
User-Agent: | KNode/4.14.1 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
DJ Delorie wrote: >> Geda developers did not bother to respond when CERN people looked >> for asked on this list looking for partners. Consequently, CERN >> decided to cooperate with kicad. > > Actually, we did talk with CERN and hoped they would partner with > us, but they chose Kicad instead. > Well, the above is what stuck in my long time memory from this post: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/38924/focus=38952 Skipping through the thread, nobody seemed to have disagreed at the time. ---<)kaimartin(>---
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |