delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:06:37 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201507132106.t6DL6btb018908@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20150713205844.GD8712@localhost.localdomain> |
(geda-user AT delorie DOT com) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Re: The new to do |
References: | <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<CAM2RGhQ_RfN4x=s7BBy_3T8tfe4aNER-FRBOV_9wbo=90eMcbQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<55A41CB5 DOT 1010604 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150713205844 DOT GD8712 AT localhost DOT localdomain> | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Just push it, and don't wait for the "broad consensus". If something > is wrong, there's already a chance to fix it afterwards. I agree. The risk/reward of having to revert a patch is better than the risk/reward of bitrotting a patch.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |