delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Virus-Scanned: | amavisd-new at neurotica.com |
X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: | I do not consent to surveillance, prick |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; |
s=default; t=1436815180; | |
bh=MiCWs61jj33SG+22iHfHP3g5+3XxaDT9TpWJN9CwfDA=; | |
h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; | |
b=E6XSu4C1JrmmHAHu7JZdxCXq26KMSjAWVI9NuIjDJQoL3K0g0XZSwHnoZmKDgFMae | |
pxgljZRrCw/z8JqQNBhrmr6X2FlB/ZkR8LVLeo5f0dyECFy7Z+ZLrfumv/spUhO2Jh | |
qS20qkkFpqHr69IeBG/+QkjEPgcLb/5ZSrixv5Rc= | |
Message-ID: | <55A40F4C.8020205@neurotica.com> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:19:40 -0400 |
From: | "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD) |
References: | <76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> <1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA AT icloud DOT com> <CAOP4iL0dWqVnAXRSfYKRW4BknJ5WK5oFceSg7TWcb3m57oUesA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <871tgb99sm DOT fsf AT rover DOT gag DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <871tgb99sm.fsf@rover.gag.com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
On 07/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bdale Garbee wrote: > "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes: > >> And schematic capture is a single layer PCB with minimal widths >> and thickness where lines crossing at right angles do not >> connect. > > Ah, no. To me, at least. Schematic capture is about creating and > maintaining documentation for a set of objects, their connectivity, > and arbitrary attributes attached to the parts and/or their > connectivity. What a schematic *looks like* is almost irrelevant... > ;-) Heh...until you try to repair something. ;) Today's trendy schematics seem to consist almost exclusively of boxes with netnames attached to pins, and few if any lines. Just try troubleshooting something with that, it's almost useless! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |