X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=RjLyaa2Why1H+NGAvgvI0ucaKr49Y9mVrCDWNSjrC6Q=;
	b=mESOOxJ2Koi1QVxQwo5E0OSMtlvtu5EtwtxuIQHC8LC2OkIEuuYmWT5fgqocPV3/B0
	J7cPLBWQ5N6iZwoaYFNNb8TW3T3SAPzh7DMiJgkFfgVF7L7PohKeMnekTeYgoCRiiSSg
	B7RkEfUUPfhpXw+EFPC8vSYmpEKfiLDVNbSb7Ck7yvVYhnRsWjxdCmxNj3DggTMbMmH+
	3j+RmSIFgJ7zBk20ZeoKXDRhTOvNbSuT0cn+IXI3FColRB8kroIpZub9EywD+vsn6EPT
	ZevBJLruTIxorZY7FeuZ/0m+ZlX7Qbw6lDiS1yEsFff1r+lbZaNle+fexLDThuIyEoaW
	/N4w==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.161.197 with SMTP id xu5mr29611200lbb.69.1436744533983;
	Sun, 12 Jul 2015 16:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<55A2E9B7.9040502@neurotica.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:42:13 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The new to do
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 04:46 PM, Kovacs Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>> What are the alternatives? Stay on Gtk+ 2 or Qt?
>>
>> Why do we want change something, which is not broken? Do we have
>> some issues with GTK2? I don't think so. GTK3 is ugly. Why do we
>> talk about it?
>>
>> If we must change, then change to QT.
>>
>> I think GTK2 is okay. There are a tons of other things to do with
>> gEDA.
>
>   Seconded.  GTK2 looks and works great.  There's a reason why many
> people and projects have stuck with GTK2 rather than "upgrade" to GTK3.

I am not a fan of GTK3. Qt has other complications. There was a
movement afoot to unify the windows spawned by gschem into one format.
I think that needs to be giving an extra going over. Then we need to
migrate over to a unified HID interface as PCB did. That is assuming
someone (not me) really wants to put the labour in.

As much as I like GTK2 I have a strong feeling that the whole GTK vs
Qt debate will be moot in a few years. The embedded space will bring
sanity back to the GTK3 developer's footprint. If they even persist
that long, a lot of people were alienated by GTK3. Qt already has an
embedded version. What they need is a way to scale between the two
with less effort. GTK will evolve too.

OT: does anyone else wonder what this will do to the space?
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/12/0147256/google-to-replace-gtk-with-its-own-aura-in-chrome

Why not just go to Qt whole hog? Well for one thing we have higher
priorities, for another Qt's license options are GPL3 or LGPL2/3. The
GPL3 dependency is something I for one would like to avoid.

>              -Dave
>
> --
> Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
> New Kensington, PA



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -