delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=dTZ4UfH7mDbKCPx3i4QbFueiCLv9uICy/c+9/AUinwQ=; | |
b=voy/LO1JCHfMkkURfCqudTfDJ115REHDpxxk7iNFgPhDoaBWg0kL6YEo4kZ9ENyd0+ | |
tGkqNxWkF/PdQANmf6PCev4/Yj8f5NCwSl3Jhd6wBaw4iVnqrTOsPJI/Vv9OGzjx0ioO | |
a+BauUnpJgaT/ey40OGAmE7BPhaRebl6puD8hUks0Rmq1sF1lza6PagjLc5HJSO6tjmm | |
vwwGWRX8aajLXEnSUksiXJok8R6qxY750yJg6yzZwoNLN2BsV3ivDNYYrIAnP1nUuD6J | |
eAgcfZAl/q9B6uTxML5uOvSd4ojaaFJBFetFc/VEdvMXv9Y1bEONWNyHnaZ1JIpRwz6j | |
H2YA== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.107.132.7 with SMTP id g7mr6335307iod.9.1436730721070; Sun, |
12 Jul 2015 12:52:01 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <55A2BD04.6070400@ecosensory.com> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
<CAC4O8c_9mvUW6ub2EWCs2boucLdnzj5O_xCsaCNEaT17brLe0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091922140 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> | |
<CAC4O8c9jPo_wbpk2xnzGr6+Gdg0OFSBPyA-FYHjn_pE1PehZog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<55A229D3 DOT 3080501 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com> | |
<55A29426 DOT 8080908 AT xs4all DOT nl> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507122008480 DOT 4570 AT nimbus> | |
<CAOP4iL2GjggOYaZK+zpmt2na50iH57bh=+mK5pHfj=kPjqvGcw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<55A2BD04 DOT 6070400 AT ecosensory DOT com> | |
Date: | Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:52:00 -0700 |
Message-ID: | <CAOP4iL3VWCA-htMXR32jwvZNPBY0Boo0mHTAvOMFXY2d2-_szw@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? |
From: | "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
--001a113ecb9444757e051ab2f042 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote: > On 07/12/2015 01:54 PM, Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> If you could extract all of the gschem schematic code and move it into a >> separate module then any tool needing a graphics engine >> would only have to figure out how to rewire that module for their own >> usage. >> > > When would this rewiring happen? In code? Compile time? Make files? Not > sure I understand you. > > Do you mean redo the code parameters of the graphics part of gschem to > handle other schematic-like uses? > That might get more interest...unless GTK+ is "sooo passe" they won't > abide it. > Gschem/src would get a new subdirectory named schematic that would contain all the current code for handling components, .sch and .sym files, wires vectors attributes and hierarchy. This could be copied to a new name and used as a template for another tool. For example a finite state machine tool would change the component code to handle states. A state is always a circle rather than a part loaded from a library. The wire code is changed to use arcs instead of straight lines and they always terminate on a state circle. The toolbar menus would change to remove any schematic menus and replace them with FSM menus. You would compile this into a new tool with a different name that used this fsm module instead of the schematic one(make files). The base code for gschem would be a brain dead graphics tool like visio and all the smarts would be added via modules. John Eaton --001a113ecb9444757e051ab2f042 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te">On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM, John Griessen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<= a href=3D"mailto:john AT ecosensory DOT com" target=3D"_blank">john AT ecosensory DOT com= </a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin= :0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">O= n 07/12/2015 01:54 PM, Ouabache Designworks (<a href=3D"mailto:z3qmtr45 AT gma= il.com" target=3D"_blank">z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:ge= da-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] wrote:<br= > </span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-= left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""> If you could extract all of the gschem schematic code and move it into a se= parate module then any tool needing a graphics engine<br></span> would only have to figure out how to rewire that module for their own usage= .<br> </blockquote> <br> When would this rewiring happen?=C2=A0 In code? Compile time? Make files? N= ot sure I understand you.<br> <br> Do you mean redo the code parameters of the graphics part of gschem to hand= le other schematic-like uses?<br> That might get more interest...unless GTK+ is "sooo passe" they w= on't abide it.<br></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>=C2=A0Gschem/src= would get a new subdirectory named schematic that would contain all the cu= rrent code for handling components, .sch and .sym files, wires vectors attr= ibutes and hierarchy.=C2=A0 This could be copied to a new name and used as = a template for another tool. For example a finite state machine tool would = change the component code to handle states. A state is always a circle rath= er than=C2=A0 a part loaded from a library. The wire code is changed to use= arcs instead of straight lines and they always terminate on a state circle= . The toolbar menus would change to remove any schematic menus and replace = them with FSM menus.<br><br></div><div>You would compile this into a new to= ol with a different name that used this fsm module instead of the schematic= one(make files).=C2=A0 The base code for gschem would be a brain dead grap= hics tool like visio and all the smarts would be added via modules. <br><br= ></div><div>John Eaton<br><br></div><div><br></div></div><br></div></div> --001a113ecb9444757e051ab2f042--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |