delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:31:58 +0200 (CEST) |
From: | Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> |
To: | "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | [geda-user] Back annotation (was: developer excitement?) |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1507090507530.6924@igor2priv> |
Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507091329350.3444@nimbus> |
References: | <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> |
User-Agent: | Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > Back annotation is something I'd love to have but the way I imagine that > feature, it would require major changes, many of which would require UI > changes. Could you explain how you imagine back annotation to work?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |