delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20150708230514.31966.qmail@stuge.se> |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jul 2015 01:05:14 +0200 |
From: | "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still |
alive? | |
Mail-Followup-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201507082208 DOT t68M89eQ016621 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw@mail.gmail.com> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I am trying to find a way to bring back the higher level of engagement I think the best course of action is that you work on what engages you. Anything else will not likely engage anyone else. //Peter
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |