X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20150704181229.9423.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Sat, 4 Jul 2015 20:12:29 +0200
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] libgeda3
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhSkHSm8h571=3GePQUm-HAnxeb7-HCF=p2a+QUzP6rNkA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507041329400 DOT 8210 AT nimbus> <CAM2RGhSzNfL0yy49ZLhLY-G8+JxRxVnMRqVaoN3OiSzwV8v9oA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhSzNfL0yy49ZLhLY-G8+JxRxVnMRqVaoN3OiSzwV8v9oA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Roland, No offense but I am trying to add onto what already exists.
> gEDA already suffers from too much fragmentation of effort.

I think Roland is also adding onto what already exists.

It makes a lot of sense to me to keep code with strong ties together,
case in point gschem and libgeda.

Adding a new library and interface onto what already exists is a good
development if the library and interface make sense. It seems they do.

I think Xorn sounds useful, and it doesn't seem to take anything away
from anywhere else.


//Peter

- Raw text -